Comprehensive Code Review Implementation Plan

For Claude: REQUIRED SUB-SKILL: Use superpowers:executing-plans to implement this plan task-by-task.

Status: Active Last Updated: 2025-11-02 Related Docs: Design Document, Python Standards, Architecture Patterns Code Location: engineering/ (entire Python codebase)

Goal: Review and fix all 134 Python files to meet engineering standards through automated compliance pass, deep manual review of critical files, and comprehensive sweep of remaining files.

Architecture: Three-phase approach - Phase 1 uses automated tools (Black, Ruff, mypy) for quick compliance wins, Phase 2 performs deep 7-point manual inspection of 15 critical files, Phase 3 systematically reviews remaining 119 files with 5-point streamlined checklist.

Tech Stack: Black (formatting), Ruff (linting + isort), mypy (type checking), pytest (testing), Git (version control)

Pre-Implementation: Setup Tasks

Task 0: Create Progress Tracker

Files: - Create: engineering/code-review-progress.md

Step 1: Create progress tracking file

cat > engineering/code-review-progress.md << 'EOF'
# Code Review Progress

**Started**: 2025-11-02
**Status**: In Progress
**Current Phase**: 1 of 3

## Phase Completion

- [ ] Phase 1: Automated Compliance (0/134 files)
- [ ] Phase 2: Critical Path Review (0/15 files)
- [ ] Phase 3: Comprehensive Sweep (0/119 files)

## Session Log

### Session 1 (2025-11-02)
- Phase: 1 (Automated)
- Files completed: 0
- Token usage: 0/200000
EOF

Step 2: Commit progress tracker

git add engineering/code-review-progress.md
git commit -m "docs: create code review progress tracker

Track progress across 3 phases:
- Phase 1: Automated (134 files)
- Phase 2: Critical (15 files)
- Phase 3: Comprehensive (119 files)

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>"

Task 1: Tighten Tool Configuration

Files: - Modify: pyproject.toml:44-50 (mypy section) - Modify: pyproject.toml:22-42 (ruff section)

Step 1: Update mypy configuration for strict type checking

Edit pyproject.toml mypy section:

[tool.mypy]
python_version = "3.9"
warn_return_any = true
warn_unused_configs = true
disallow_untyped_defs = true       # ← Changed from false (STRICT)
warn_unused_ignores = true         # ← New
strict_optional = true             # ← New
ignore_missing_imports = true
check_untyped_defs = true

Step 2: Add Ruff docstring checking

Add to pyproject.toml ruff section:

[tool.ruff]
line-length = 100
target-version = "py39"
select = [
    "E",   # pycodestyle errors
    "W",   # pycodestyle warnings
    "F",   # pyflakes
    "I",   # isort
    "C",   # flake8-comprehensions
    "B",   # flake8-bugbear
    "UP",  # pyupgrade
    "D",   # pydocstyle (docstrings) ← New
]
ignore = [
    "E501",  # line too long (handled by black)
    "B008",  # do not perform function calls in argument defaults
    "C901",  # too complex (we'll handle complexity case by case)
]

[tool.ruff.pydocstyle]
convention = "google"  # Enforce Google-style docstrings

Step 3: Test configuration changes

cd backend/epgoat
mypy --version
ruff --version
black --version

Expected: All tools installed and versions displayed

Step 4: Commit configuration changes

git add pyproject.toml
git commit -m "chore: tighten Python tool configuration for strict standards

- Enable strict type checking in mypy (disallow_untyped_defs)
- Add docstring linting with Ruff (pydocstyle)
- Enforce Google-style docstrings convention

Prepares for comprehensive code review.

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>"

Phase 1: Automated Compliance Pass

Task 2: Batch 1 - Core Modules (20 files)

Files: - Modify: backend/epgoat/core/*.py (~20 files)

Step 1: Run isort to fix import order

cd backend/epgoat
ruff check --select I --fix core/

Expected: Import order fixed automatically

Step 2: Run Black to format code

black core/

Expected: "X files reformatted" or "All done!"

Step 3: Run Ruff auto-fix for safe violations

ruff check --fix core/

Expected: Safe violations fixed automatically

Step 4: Run mypy to identify type hint gaps

mypy core/ > /tmp/mypy-core-violations.txt
cat /tmp/mypy-core-violations.txt

Expected: List of type errors to fix manually

Step 5: Fix type hint violations manually

For each file with type errors: 1. Read the file 2. Add missing type hints based on mypy output 3. Run mypy core/<filename>.py to verify

Example fix:

# Before
def get_channel(channel_id):
    return channels.get(channel_id)

# After
def get_channel(channel_id: str) -> Optional[Channel]:
    return channels.get(channel_id)

Step 6: Validate all checks pass

make ci

Expected: All tests pass, no linting errors, no type errors

Step 7: Commit Batch 1

git add backend/epgoat/core/
git commit -m "refactor: apply automated standards to core/ modules (Batch 1/6)

- Fix import order (isort via Ruff)
- Apply Black formatting
- Add missing type hints
- Fix Ruff violations

Files: ~20 core modules
Phase 1 progress: 20/134 (15%)

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>"

Step 8: Update progress tracker

Mark Batch 1 complete in engineering/code-review-progress.md

Task 3: Batch 2 - Services Layer (25 files)

Files: - Modify: backend/epgoat/services/*.py (~25 files)

Step 1: Run automated tools sequence

cd backend/epgoat
ruff check --select I --fix backend/epgoat/services/
black backend/epgoat/services/
ruff check --fix backend/epgoat/services/

Step 2: Generate type hint gap report

mypy backend/epgoat/services/ > /tmp/mypy-services-violations.txt
cat /tmp/mypy-services-violations.txt

Step 3: Fix type hint violations

Work through mypy violations file by file, adding type hints.

Step 4: Validate

make ci

Step 5: Commit Batch 2

git add backend/epgoat/services/
git commit -m "refactor: apply automated standards to backend/epgoat/services/ layer (Batch 2/6)

- Fix import order, formatting, linting
- Add missing type hints to all service files

Files: ~25 service modules
Phase 1 progress: 45/134 (34%)

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>"

Step 6: Update progress tracker

Task 4: Batch 3 - Pipeline Components (15 files)

Files: - Modify: backend/epgoat/pipeline/*.py (~15 files)

Repeat same sequence as Batch 2:

Run automated tools (isort, Black, Ruff)
Generate mypy report
Fix type hints
Validate with make ci
Commit with progress message (60/134, 45%)
Update tracker

Task 5: Batch 4 - Database Layer (18 files)

Files: - Modify: backend/epgoat/infrastructure/database/*.py (~18 files)

Repeat same sequence:

Automated tools
mypy report
Fix type hints (special attention to repository patterns)
Validate
Commit (78/134, 58%)
Update tracker

Task 6: Batch 5 - Utilities & Helpers (30 files)

Files: - Modify: backend/epgoat/utils/*.py + backend/epgoat/helpers/*.py (~30 files)

Repeat same sequence:

Automated tools
mypy report
Fix type hints
Validate
Commit (108/134, 81%)
Update tracker

Task 7: Batch 6 - Tests (26 files)

Files: - Modify: backend/epgoat/tests/*.py (~26 files)

Note: Tests have relaxed type hint requirements but still need formatting

Step 1: Run automated tools

cd backend/epgoat
black tests/
ruff check --fix tests/

Step 2: Run mypy (informational only)

mypy tests/ || true  # Don't fail on test type errors

Step 3: Validate tests still pass

make test

Step 4: Commit Batch 6

git add backend/epgoat/tests/
git commit -m "refactor: apply formatting standards to tests/ (Batch 6/6)

- Apply Black formatting
- Fix Ruff violations
- Tests remain passing

Phase 1 COMPLETE: 134/134 files (100%)

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>"

Step 5: Update progress tracker - Phase 1 complete

Task 8: Phase 1 Validation

Step 1: Run full CI suite

make ci

Expected: All tests pass, no linting errors, no type errors

Step 2: Generate Phase 1 summary report

cat >> engineering/code-review-progress.md << 'EOF'

## Phase 1 Summary

**Status**: Complete ✅
**Files processed**: 134/134
**Batches**: 6
**Violations fixed**:
- Type hints added: [count from mypy reports]
- Formatting issues: [count from Black]
- Linting issues: [count from Ruff]
- Import order: [count from isort]

**All files now pass:**
- Black formatting ✅
- Ruff linting ✅
- mypy type checking ✅
- All tests passing ✅
EOF

Step 3: Commit Phase 1 completion

git add engineering/code-review-progress.md
git commit -m "docs: complete Phase 1 automated compliance

All 134 Python files now meet basic standards:
- 100% type hint coverage
- Black formatted
- Ruff clean
- Tests passing

Next: Phase 2 (Critical Path Review)

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>"

Step 4: Push to remote

git push

Phase 2: Critical Path Deep Review

Task 9: Review api_enrichment.py (Critical File 1/15)

Files: - Read: backend/epgoat/services/api_enrichment.py - Modify: backend/epgoat/services/api_enrichment.py (if violations found)

Step 1: Read the file completely

# Use Read tool to load the entire file

Step 2: 7-Point Inspection

1. Architecture Review: - Check SOLID principles compliance - Verify separation of concerns - Check dependency injection - Identify design patterns used

2. Type Safety: - Verify 100% type hint coverage (already done in Phase 1) - Check for Any types - should use specific types - Verify proper use of generics - Check Optional handling

3. Documentation: - Verify all public functions have Google-style docstrings - Check for Args, Returns, Raises, Examples sections - Verify complex algorithms are explained - Check module docstring exists

4. Error Handling: - No bare except: clauses - Specific exception types - Proper logging - Graceful degradation

5. Testing: - Check test file exists (tests/backend/epgoat/services/test_api_enrichment.py) - Verify >80% coverage - Check edge cases tested

6. Performance: - No N+1 queries - Appropriate caching - Efficient algorithms

7. Security: - Input validation - No SQL injection risks - Secrets in environment variables

Step 3: Document violations found

Create a violation list for this file:

### api_enrichment.py Violations

**Architecture:**
- [ ] Function `process_channels` >50 lines (Line 145-210) - extract helper methods
- [ ] Direct database access instead of repository pattern (Line 89)

**Documentation:**
- [ ] Missing docstring on `_internal_helper` (Line 234)
- [ ] Missing Examples section in `enrich_event` docstring

**Error Handling:**
- [ ] Bare except clause (Line 178) - should catch specific exceptions
- [ ] No logging for API failures (Line 156)

**Testing:**
- [ ] No test for error path when API rate limited
- [ ] Missing integration test for full enrichment flow

**Performance:**
- [ ] Repeated API calls in loop (Line 145-160) - should batch

**Security:**
- [ ] No validation of channel.name before regex (Line 92)

Step 4: Fix violations immediately

For each violation: 1. Fix the issue in code 2. Run tests to verify 3. Update violation list with ✅

Example fix:

# Before
try:
    result = api_call()
except:  # Bare except - violation
    return None

# After
try:
    result = api_call()
except (APIError, ConnectionError) as e:  # Specific exceptions
    logger.error(f"API call failed: {e}")
    return None

Step 5: Validate fixes

cd backend/epgoat
mypy backend/epgoat/services/api_enrichment.py
ruff check backend/epgoat/services/api_enrichment.py
pytest tests/backend/epgoat/services/test_api_enrichment.py -v

Expected: All checks pass

Step 6: Commit api_enrichment.py fixes

git add backend/epgoat/services/api_enrichment.py tests/backend/epgoat/services/test_api_enrichment.py
git commit -m "refactor(services): improve api_enrichment.py quality (Critical 1/15)

7-Point inspection complete:
- Extract long functions into helpers
- Add missing docstrings
- Fix error handling (specific exceptions)
- Add input validation
- Improve test coverage

Phase 2 progress: 1/15 (7%)

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>"

Step 7: Update progress tracker

Task 10-23: Review Remaining Critical Files (14 files)

Repeat Task 9 pattern for each critical file:

Task 10: regex_matcher.py (Critical 2/15) Task 11: enhanced_league_inference.py (Critical 3/15) Task 12: patterns.py (Critical 4/15) Task 13: league_normalizer.py (Critical 5/15) Task 14: database/repositories/event_repository.py (Critical 6/15) Task 15: database/repositories/match_repository.py (Critical 7/15) Task 16: database/schema_validator.py (Critical 8/15) Task 17: database/d1_client.py (Critical 9/15) Task 18: backend/epgoat/services/thesportsdb_client.py (Critical 10/15) Task 19: api/handlers.py (Critical 11/15) Task 20: middleware/error_handler.py (Critical 12/15) Task 21: epg_generator.py (Critical 13/15) Task 22: pipeline/schedulers.py (Critical 14/15) Task 23: pipeline/xmltv.py (Critical 15/15)

For each file: 1. Read completely 2. 7-point inspection 3. Document violations 4. Fix immediately 5. Validate 6. Commit individually 7. Update tracker

Task 24: Phase 2 Validation

Step 1: Run full test suite

make test-coverage

Expected: >80% coverage on all critical files

Step 2: Generate Phase 2 summary

cat >> engineering/code-review-progress.md << 'EOF'

## Phase 2 Summary

**Status**: Complete ✅
**Files reviewed**: 15/15 critical files
**Violations fixed**: [total count]
**Test coverage**: >80% on all critical paths
**Architecture improvements**: [list major refactors]

**Critical files now meet:**
- SOLID principles ✅
- 100% type safety ✅
- Complete documentation ✅
- Robust error handling ✅
- Comprehensive testing ✅
- Performance optimized ✅
- Security hardened ✅
EOF

Step 3: Commit Phase 2 completion

git add engineering/code-review-progress.md
git commit -m "docs: complete Phase 2 critical path review

15 critical files deeply reviewed and improved:
- Matching pipeline (5 files)
- Data integrity (4 files)
- API integration (3 files)
- Core pipeline (3 files)

All critical systems now meet 7-point quality standards.

Next: Phase 3 (Comprehensive Sweep)

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>"

Step 4: Push to remote

git push

Phase 3: Comprehensive Sweep

Task 25: High Priority Batch 1 - Utilities (30 files)

Files: - Modify: backend/epgoat/utils/*.py + backend/epgoat/helpers/*.py (~30 files)

5-Point Streamlined Review per file:

Step 1: Review file against checklist

For each file: 1. Docstring Completeness: All public functions have Google-style docstrings? 2. Type Hint Correctness: Types accurate and specific (not just present)? 3. Error Handling: Appropriate exceptions, proper logging? 4. Code Complexity: Functions <50 lines, complexity <10? 5. YAGNI Violations: Dead code, over-engineering, unused imports?

Step 2: Document violations

Create violation list for batch.

Step 3: Fix violations

Process files in groups of 5-10 for efficiency.

Step 4: Validate

make ci

Step 5: Commit batch

git add backend/epgoat/utils/ backend/epgoat/helpers/
git commit -m "refactor: comprehensive review of utilities/helpers (Phase 3 - Batch 1/5)

5-point review complete for 30 files:
- Docstrings added/improved
- Type hints corrected
- Error handling enhanced
- Complexity reduced
- Dead code removed

Phase 3 progress: 30/119 (25%)

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>"

Step 6: Update tracker

Task 26: Medium Priority Batch 2 - Models & Parsers (40 files)

Files: - Modify: backend/epgoat/domain/*.py + backend/epgoat/parsers/*.py (~40 files)

Repeat 5-point review pattern:

Review against checklist
Document violations
Fix issues
Validate
Commit (70/119, 59%)
Update tracker

Task 27: Medium Priority Batch 3 - Formatters & Validators (40 files)

Files: - Modify: backend/epgoat/formatters/*.py + backend/epgoat/validators/*.py (~40 files)

Repeat 5-point review pattern:

Review
Document
Fix
Validate
Commit (110/119, 92%)
Update tracker

Task 28: Lower Priority Batch 4 - Scripts & Tools (9 files)

Files: - Modify: engineering/scripts/*.py + engineering/tools/*.py (~9 files)

Repeat 5-point review pattern:

Review
Document
Fix
Validate
Commit (119/119, 100%)
Update tracker

Task 29: Phase 3 Validation

Step 1: Run complete validation

make ci
python3 scripts/validate_documentation_standards.py  # Check docstrings

Step 2: Generate Phase 3 summary

cat >> engineering/code-review-progress.md << 'EOF'

## Phase 3 Summary

**Status**: Complete ✅
**Files reviewed**: 119/119 remaining files
**Batches**: 4
**Violations fixed**: [total count]

**All files now meet:**
- Complete docstrings ✅
- Accurate type hints ✅
- Proper error handling ✅
- Reduced complexity ✅
- No YAGNI violations ✅
EOF

Step 3: Commit Phase 3 completion

git add engineering/code-review-progress.md
git commit -m "docs: complete Phase 3 comprehensive sweep

All 119 remaining files reviewed:
- 30 utilities/helpers
- 40 backend/epgoat/domain/parsers
- 40 formatters/validators
- 9 scripts/tools

100% of codebase now meets engineering standards.

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>"

Step 4: Push to remote

git push

Final Validation & Reporting

Task 30: Generate Final Code Review Report

Files: - Create: engineering/CODE-REVIEW-REPORT.md

Step 1: Create comprehensive summary report

cat > engineering/CODE-REVIEW-REPORT.md << 'EOF'
# Code Review Report

**Date Completed**: 2025-11-02
**Scope**: 134 Python files in engineering/
**Approach**: Three-phase (Automated → Critical → Comprehensive)

---

## Summary

✅ **100% of codebase reviewed and fixed**

### Phase 1: Automated Compliance
- **Files**: 134/134
- **Violations fixed**: [total]
  - Type hints added: [count]
  - Formatting issues: [count]
  - Linting issues: [count]

### Phase 2: Critical Path Review
- **Files**: 15/15
- **7-point inspection**: PASS
- **Test coverage**: >80%
- **Major refactors**: [list]

### Phase 3: Comprehensive Sweep
- **Files**: 119/119
- **5-point review**: PASS
- **Docstrings added**: [count]
- **Complexity reduced**: [count files]

---

## Standards Compliance

All files now meet:
✅ Python Standards (01-Python-Standards.md)
✅ Architecture Patterns (03-Architecture-Patterns.md)
✅ Testing Standards (04-Testing-Standards.md)
✅ Documentation Standards (05-Documentation-Standards.md)

---

## Tool Compliance

✅ **Black**: 100% formatted
✅ **Ruff**: 0 violations
✅ **mypy**: 0 type errors
✅ **pytest**: All tests passing

---

## Key Improvements

### Architecture
<div class="kanban-column">
- [List major architectural improvements]
</div>

### Type Safety
- Added [count] type hints
- Eliminated all `Any` types
- Proper use of generics throughout

### Documentation
<div class="kanban-column">
- [count]</div>
 docstrings added
- All public APIs documented
- Complex algorithms explained

### Error Handling
- Eliminated all bare `except` clauses
- Specific exception types used
- Comprehensive logging added

### Testing
- Coverage improved to >80%
- Edge cases covered
- Integration tests added

### Performance
<div class="kanban-column">
- [List performance improvements]
</div>

### Security
- Input validation added
- SQL injection risks eliminated
- Secrets properly managed

---

## Recommendations

### Immediate
<div class="kanban-column">
- [List any immediate follow-up items]
</div>

### Short-term
<div class="kanban-column">
- [List short-term improvements]
</div>

### Long-term
<div class="kanban-column">
- [List long-term architecture improvements]
</div>

---

## Conclusion

The EPGOAT codebase now meets all engineering standards. All 134 Python files have been reviewed and improved for quality, maintainability, and security.

**Next Steps**: Maintain standards through CI/CD enforcement and code review process.
EOF

Step 2: Commit report

git add engineering/CODE-REVIEW-REPORT.md
git commit -m "docs: add final code review report

Comprehensive review complete:
- 134 Python files reviewed
- 100% standards compliance
- 3 phases executed successfully

All code now meets engineering standards.

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>"

Task 31: Update Progress Tracker - COMPLETE

Step 1: Mark all phases complete

cat > engineering/code-review-progress.md << 'EOF'
# Code Review Progress

**Started**: 2025-11-02
**Status**: COMPLETE ✅
**Completed**: 2025-11-02

## Phase Completion

- [x] Phase 1: Automated Compliance (134/134) ✅
- [x] Phase 2: Critical Path Review (15/15) ✅
- [x] Phase 3: Comprehensive Sweep (119/119) ✅

## Summary

**Total files reviewed**: 134
**Total violations fixed**: [count]
**Sessions used**: [count]
**Total tokens**: [count]

All Python code now meets engineering standards.

See: CODE-REVIEW-REPORT.md for detailed report.
EOF

Step 2: Final commit

git add engineering/code-review-progress.md
git commit -m "docs: mark code review complete

🎉 ALL 134 FILES REVIEWED

- Phase 1: Automated compliance ✅
- Phase 2: Critical path review ✅
- Phase 3: Comprehensive sweep ✅

100% standards compliance achieved.

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>"

Step 3: Push final changes

git push

Task 32: CI/CD Integration (Optional but Recommended)

Files: - Modify: .github/workflows/ci.yml

Step 1: Add strict standards enforcement to CI

Add to .github/workflows/ci.yml:

- name: Check code formatting
  run: |
    cd backend/epgoat
    black --check .

- name: Check linting
  run: |
    cd backend/epgoat
    ruff check .

- name: Check type hints
  run: |
    cd backend/epgoat
    mypy .

Step 2: Commit CI updates

git add .github/workflows/ci.yml
git commit -m "ci: enforce strict code standards in CI/CD

All PRs must now pass:
- Black formatting check
- Ruff linting (including docstrings)
- mypy type checking (strict mode)

Prevents regressions from code review work.

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>"

Step 3: Push CI changes

git push

Success Criteria

Phase 1 Complete When:

✅ All 134 files pass make ci
✅ mypy reports 0 type errors with disallow_untyped_defs = true
✅ Black reports 0 formatting issues
✅ Ruff reports 0 linting violations
✅ Progress tracker updated

Phase 2 Complete When:

✅ All 15 critical files pass 7-point inspection
✅ Test coverage >80% on critical paths
✅ All immediate fixes applied
✅ TODO comments added for complex refactors
✅ Progress tracker updated

Phase 3 Complete When:

✅ All 119 remaining files reviewed
✅ All violations fixed or documented
✅ Progress tracker shows 100%
✅ All tests passing

Overall Success:

✅ 100% files meet engineering standards
✅ 0 type errors across entire codebase
✅ All tests passing
✅ Complete docstrings on all public APIs
✅ Progress tracker complete
✅ Final report published
✅ CI/CD enforcing standards

Execution Notes

Token Management

Estimated total: 600k-850k tokens
Expected sessions: 6-9 sessions
Checkpoint frequency: After each batch/file
Progress tracking: Continuous updates

Session Handoff

When approaching token limit (<20k): 1. Complete current file/batch 2. Commit changes 3. Update progress tracker 4. Push to remote 5. Note next file/batch in progress tracker

Resuming

Read engineering/code-review-progress.md
Find last completed item
Resume at next file/batch
Continue with same standards

Comprehensive Code Review Implementation Plan

Pre-Implementation: Setup Tasks

Task 0: Create Progress Tracker

Task 1: Tighten Tool Configuration

Phase 1: Automated Compliance Pass

Task 2: Batch 1 - Core Modules (20 files)

Task 3: Batch 2 - Services Layer (25 files)

Task 4: Batch 3 - Pipeline Components (15 files)

Task 5: Batch 4 - Database Layer (18 files)

Task 6: Batch 5 - Utilities & Helpers (30 files)

Task 7: Batch 6 - Tests (26 files)

Task 8: Phase 1 Validation

Phase 2: Critical Path Deep Review

Task 9: Review api_enrichment.py (Critical File 1/15)

Task 10-23: Review Remaining Critical Files (14 files)

Task 24: Phase 2 Validation

Phase 3: Comprehensive Sweep

Task 25: High Priority Batch 1 - Utilities (30 files)

Task 26: Medium Priority Batch 2 - Models & Parsers (40 files)

Task 27: Medium Priority Batch 3 - Formatters & Validators (40 files)

Task 28: Lower Priority Batch 4 - Scripts & Tools (9 files)

Task 29: Phase 3 Validation

Final Validation & Reporting

Task 30: Generate Final Code Review Report

Task 31: Update Progress Tracker - COMPLETE

Task 32: CI/CD Integration (Optional but Recommended)

Success Criteria

Phase 1 Complete When:

Phase 2 Complete When:

Phase 3 Complete When:

Overall Success:

Execution Notes

Token Management

Session Handoff

Resuming

Related Documentation